| Segments | Relation type | Relation name | Document | Tagger | Area | Notes |
An open-ended multidisciplinary approach, developed by Bugarski (1996a; 1996b) and adapted for the purposes of this paper, is tested against the data coming from various scientific fields, such as computer science, quality control and quality management, linguistics, engineering, etc. | The analysis of the data at hand - international terms most of which have not yet been standardized in Serbian - indicate that a hierarchy of criteria for evaluating the terms, which are to be fully accepted in a given scientific register, should be organized in such a way as to give primacy to the parameter measuring the international value of terms, the shortness parameter and the monosemy parameter.
| In all the instances analyzed herein the English borrowings are given primacy over translation and structural calques in the linguistic code which could be labeled as "modern scientific variety of Serbian".
| list | N-N | TERM18_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Some of the difficulties faced will be discussed, | and ideas will be given for approaching this field in present day society.
| list | N-N | TERM19_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Alde batetik, gero eta indartsuagoa da nazioarteko harmonizazioa lortu beharra, ekonomian, politikan eta kultura eta gizarte gaietan etenik gabe sortzen ari diren loturak eta elkarren arteko trukaketak eraginda; | eta bestetik, aniztasuna onartu beharra, eta, ondorioz, norbanakoen izaeraren berrespena, giza bizitzako arlo guztietan agertzen ari den moduan.
| list | N-N | TERM19_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Alderdi horiek guztiek, espezialitateko terminologiaren gehikuntza kuantitatiboa eragiteaz gain, terminologia lanen ikuspegia ere zabaldu egin dute; | eta, egia bada ere ikuspegi berri horrek terminologia aberastu egin duela esatea, zalantzan jarri ditu terminologiaren oinarrizko zenbait kontzeptu: kontzeptu-izendapen bikotearen adierabakartasuna, espezialitateko eremuen kontzeptua, eta normalizazioak terminologian duen eginbeharra.
| list | N-N | TERM19_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Our paper will discuss the methodology used by both groups in term creation. | The paper will also address the difficulties encountered in encouraging the use of new and/or standardised terminology in the Irish language.
| list | N-N | TERM23_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Gure komunikazioa talde bi horiek terminoak sortzeko erabiltzen duten metodologiaz izango da. | Irlanderazko terminologia normalizatuaren erabilpena bultzatzeko aurkitu diren arazoak ere ikusiko ditugu.
| list | N-N | TERM23_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Honela, jakin ahal izan dugu zein diren agertzen eta agertzen ez diren terminoak, zuzenbideko zein alorretakoak diren, zenbaterainoko finkapen-maila aurkitzen den euskal termino horietan, zein den gaztelaniazko terminoen euskal segmentu baliokideen egitura sintaktikoa, | eta oraindik burutu gabe dagoen azterketa lexikologiko baten bidez, termino horien zenbait alderdi lexikogenetiko aztertzeko parada dugu.
| list | N-N | TERM28_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
(how can a term be represented? | Is there a minimum representation?
| How are terms to be classified?),
| list | N-N | TERM29_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
(How should terminological databases be structured? | What relationships should be covered?
| What is a dictionary unit?).
| list | N-N | TERM29_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
(zein egitura eduki behar luke terminologiako datu-base batek? | Zein erlazio jaso behar lituzke?
| Zein da hiztegi bateko unitatea?).
| list | N-N | TERM29_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
(nola adierazi terminoa? | Ba al da gutxieneko adierazpenik?
| Nola sailkatu terminoak?),
| list | N-N | TERM29_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
because the unifying process of the language has not been completed, | research carried out is limited
| and Basque is an agglutinative language.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
2.1. Linguistic Techniques
Linguistic techniques are used basically to make the initial selection of terms.
Morpho-syntactic models are usually used, so it is advisable to have the text already analysed or at least labelled. The results are conditioned heavily by the quality of the linguistic tool used. In any event in some projects neither morphological nor syntactic analysis is carried out (Su et al., 96).
Lemmatisation is linked to morphological analysis and the removal of ambiguities. In complex inflected languages poor results will ensue if only the formal aspect of words is dealt with: lemmatisation will be necessary. Linguistic knowledge is also of prime importance in the standardisation of terminology: a discrimination between terms must be made, because some of them may form part of longer units. | 2.2. Statistical Techniques
In most projects statistical methods have been used to reduce the assumed terms which follow the linguistic model. The methods applied vary widely from project to project, so the simplest idea is to require a minimum absolute frequency (Justeson & Katz, 95), though several probabilistic formulae are generally combined.
| 2.3. Results
The results obtained are not yet those required for absolutely automatic extraction. A balance must be found between recall and precision. In this balance preference is given to recall, provided there is a person who can carry out the terminology reduction. To obtain a recall of 95% precision is usually reduced to 50%, and for a precision of 85% cover is not reduced even to 35%.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
The morphological analyser is already being prepared (Alegria et al, 96), | the lemmatizer/labeller is almost completed (Aduriz et al, 96)
| and work has been done on surface level syntax.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
1. Introduction
In recent years work has begun to develop instruments in several languages for automatic terminology extraction in technical texts, though human intervention is still required to make the final selection from the terms automatically chosen. As an example we can cite the following instruments: LEXTER (Bourigault, 92), AT & Tko Terminght (Church & Dagan, 94), TERMS by IBM (Justeson & Katz, 95) and NPtool (Arpper, 95).
Their areas of application can be divided into two main groups: information indexing and the making-up of terminological glossaries. In areas where terminology is developing dynamically, such as computer science, it is almost impossible to carry out effective terminological work without an instrument of this type.
If a similar instrument is to be developed for Basque we shall come up against more major drawbacks, because the unifying process of the language has not been completed, research carried out is limited and Basque is an agglutinative language. | 2. Terminology extraction
It is a hard task to obtain a formal, complete definition of a term, but that is precisely what a major part of this work consists of: defining the characteristics of terms. To obtain technical terms from the corpus a combination of NLP techniques (based on linguistic knowledge) and statistical techniques is usually used.
2.1. Linguistic Techniques
Linguistic techniques are used basically to make the initial selection of terms.
Morpho-syntactic models are usually used, so it is advisable to have the text already analysed or at least labelled. The results are conditioned heavily by the quality of the linguistic tool used. In any event in some projects neither morphological nor syntactic analysis is carried out (Su et al., 96).
Lemmatisation is linked to morphological analysis and the removal of ambiguities. In complex inflected languages poor results will ensue if only the formal aspect of words is dealt with: lemmatisation will be necessary. Linguistic knowledge is also of prime importance in the standardisation of terminology: a discrimination between terms must be made, because some of them may form part of longer units.
2.2. Statistical Techniques
In most projects statistical methods have been used to reduce the assumed terms which follow the linguistic model. The methods applied vary widely from project to project, so the simplest idea is to require a minimum absolute frequency (Justeson & Katz, 95), though several probabilistic formulae are generally combined.
2.3. Results
The results obtained are not yet those required for absolutely automatic extraction. A balance must be found between recall and precision. In this balance preference is given to recall, provided there is a person who can carry out the terminology reduction. To obtain a recall of 95% precision is usually reduced to 50%, and for a precision of 85% cover is not reduced even to 35%.
| 3. Application to Basque
The IXA Group intends to develop a tool of this type for Basque. The morphological analyser is already being prepared (Alegria et al, 96), the lemmatizer/labeller is almost completed (Aduriz et al, 96) and work has been done on surface level syntax.
While these tools are being prepared, we must work on the modelling of technical terms, i.e. we must reduce their characteristics. To that end, basing work on existing technical dictionaries and using statistical techniques, principal models must be obtained. We do not yet have any results, but we believe that the model will be wider than the noun phrase. In the choice of technical terms, the case of internal declension may prove decisive.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
bateratze-prozesua bukatzeke izateagatik, | egindako ikerketak murritzak direlako
| eta hizkuntza eranskaria izateagatik.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
% 95 inguruko estaldura lortzeko doitasuna % 50-era jaitsi ohi da, | eta doitasuna % 85 ingurukoa izan dadin estaldura % 35era ere ez da iristen.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Horretarako analizatzaile morfologikoa jadanik prest dago (Alegria et al., 96), | lematizatzaile/etiketatzaile bat bukatzear dago (Aduriz et al., 96)
| eta azaleko sintaxiari ere ekin diogu.
| list | N-N | TERM31_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
In English Levi clearly expressed in 1978 the need to distinguish between two types of adjectives deriving from nouns, whose semantic and syntactic characteristics were different: "nominal nonpredicating adjectives" and "denominal adjectives". The latter are derived by means of suffixes such as -y, -ful and -ous, so that they take not only their grammatical category but also their predicative nature from their suffixes. On the other hand "nominal nonpredicating adjectives" are by category adjectives but behave similarly to nouns: linguistic difficulties / language difficulties. | In the case of Spanish, as defended by Bosque in 1989, there are some generative suffixes which are unlikely to derive to referential adjectives (-esco, -il, -oso, -ino) and others which frequently derive to such adjectives (-al, -ar, -ario, -ico).
| In French, too, different suffixes are generally used to create referential and predicative adjectives, giving rise to pairs such as familial-familier and infantil-infantin.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
on the one hand are those which modify nouns denoting activities or consequences, where the referential adjective is frequently the argument of the noun.
Examples would be decisi?n presidencial ("presidential decision"), which must mean what is decided by the President, and extracci?n dental ("tooth extraction"), denoting the action of removing a tooth or molar. It is obvious that in the latter case the adjective dental is equivalent to the direct object of the verb extraer ("to extract"). In Basque compound nouns are prime candidates for this (hortz-ateratzea). However, we are unlikely to translate decisi?n presidencial as presidente-erabaki: we would almost certainly opt for presidentearen erabaki. Why is there this difference between the "subject nature" of the modifier of compound nouns and the "defined nature" of this element? | On the other hand, when referential adjectives modify the noun (an object with no argumental structure) the relationship between the noun and the adjective cannot be predicted: in this case we find a relationship of field or of ownership, which is shown by dictionary compilers by the periphrasis -ri dagokion. For instance hilo dental ("dental floss") is the floss used to clean teeth, and in Basque hortzetako haria would probably be preferred to hotz-haria. Finally, the group known in phonetics as a consonante dental would be kontsonante horzkaria and not hortz-kontsonante.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
What types of adjective can be created through adjective generating suffixes? | Although many referential adjectives can be expressed in Basque through compound words, this method clearly does not offer forms for all such adjectives. Where then is the limit?
| Where is the key? Is it in predicative/non predicative nature, in argumental, field or possessive relationships or is it elsewhere?
| Does definite/indefinite, animate/inanimate, countable/uncountable nature have any influence?
| Is impossibility influenced by whether the noun modified is an action, a consequence or an object?
| Under what conditions could we be forced to use loans to translate referential adjectives from other languages into Basque?
| When do we use noun complements in Basque to replace adjectives in other languages?
| list | N-N | TERM34_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
azkenekoak -y, -fill eta -ous bezalako atzizkien bidez eratorritakoak dira | eta haien gramatika-kategoria ezezik, haien predikatuizaera ere jasoko lukete atzizkitik.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
'nominal nonpredicating adjectives' eta 'denominal adjectives'; azkenekoak -y, -fill eta -ous bezalako atzizkien bidez eratorritakoak dira eta haien gramatika-kategoria ezezik, haien predikatuizaera ere jasoko lukete atzizkitik. | 'Nominal nonpredicating adjectives' sailean sartuko liratekeenak berriz, kategoriaz izenondoak izanik ere, izenen antzeko jokaera sintaktikoa izango lukete: linguistic difficulties / language difficulties. Gaztelaniaren kasuan Bosque-k (1989) defenditu duen bezala, badira izenondo erreferentzialak nekez ematen dituzten atzizki izenondo-sortzaileak (-esco, -oso, -ino) eta izenondo erreferentzialak eman ohi dituztenak (-al, -ar, -ario, -ico). Frantsesez ere atzizki desberdinak erabili ohi dira izenondo erreferentzialak eta predikatiboak sortzeko eta ondorioz, familial-familier eta infantilinfantin bezalako bikoteak dituzte.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
alde batetik modifikatzen duten izena ekintza- edo ondorio-izena denean, askotan gertatzen da izenondo erreferentziala izen horren argumentua izatea. Adibidez, decisi髇 presidencial ezinbestean izango da presidenteak erabakitakoa eta extracci髇 dental hortz edo hagin baten ateratzearen ekintza. Bistan da azken kasuan dental izenondoa extraer aditzaren osagarri zuzenaren parekoa dela eta euskaraz izen elkartu sintetikoak hautagai bikainak direla hauetarako (hortz-ateratzea). decisi髇 presidencial ostera, nekez egingo dugu presidente-erabaki eta presidentearen erabaki aukeratuko dugu ia zalantzarik gabe. Zein da desberdintasun honen arrazoia, izen elkartuaren mugatzailearen 'subjektutasuna' ala elementu horren 'mugatutasuna'? | Bestetik, izenondo erreferentzialek modifikatzen dutena (argurmentu-egiturarik gabeko objektu-)izena denean, izenaren eta izenondoaren arteko harremana ezin aurresan daiteke; hiztegigileek -ri dagokion perifrasiaren bidez definitzen duten esparru-harremana edo jabego-harremana dugu orduan. Adibidez, hilo dental hortzak garbitzeko erabiltzen den haria da eta euskaraz, hortzetako haria nahiago genuke seguruenik hortz-haria baino. Azkenik, fonetikaren esparruan erabiltzen den consonante dental multzorako kontsonante horzkaria erabiltzen da eta ez hortz-kontsonante.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Esate baterako, ingeleseko marginal adjektiboak erabilera erreferentziala eta predikatiboa ditu hurrenez hurren marginal note eta marginal case multzoetan; gaztelaniaz berriz, erabilera erreferentziala eta predikatiboa bereizten dituzte, nota al margen eta caso marginal eginez. | Euskararako, 'Elhuyar hiztegian' albo-ohar edo marjinako ohar aurki daiteke erabilera erreferentzialerako baina bazterreko kasu bezalako adibideak erabilera predikatiborako.
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Predikatu-/ez-predikatu izaeran, argumentu-/eremu- /jabego-harremanean edo beste nonbait al datza gakoa? | Izenondoaren jatorrian dagoen izenaren mugatu/mugagabe, bizidun/bizigabe, zenbakarri/zenbakaitza bezalako tasunek ba al dute nolabaiteko eraginik?
| Modifikatua den izena ekintza-, ondorio- edo objektu-izena izateak ba al du eraginik ezintasun horretan?
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Non dago muga? Predikatu-/ez-predikatu izaeran, argumentu-/eremu- /jabego-harremanean edo beste nonbait al datza gakoa? Izenondoaren jatorrian dagoen izenaren mugatu/mugagabe, bizidun/bizigabe, zenbakarri/zenbakaitza bezalako tasunek ba al dute nolabaiteko eraginik? Modifikatua den izena ekintza-, ondorio- edo objektu-izena izateak ba al du eraginik ezintasun horretan? | Zein dira erdal izenondo erreferentzial bat ezinbestean mailegatu behar izatera eraman gaitzaketen baldintzak?
| Noiz erabili ohi ditugu euskal izenlagunak erdal izenondoak ordezkatzeko?
| list | N-N | TERM34_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
First of all the channel through which Internet terms are made known is the net itself. This means that they not only spread rapidly (information on the internet can be accessed almost immediately) but also reach vast areas (all over the world). | Furthermore, terms can be compiled, discussed and assessed anywhere: many Web sites can be found which give glossaries of Internet terms or propose names and even invite users to vote on them.
| list | N-N | TERM38_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
How do the receiving languages respond to this? | How do they deal with Internet terminology?
| Are all those words which seem to be terms actually terms?
| Do they meet actual needs for names or do sensationalist, ephemeral terms abound?
| list | N-N | TERM38_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
What type of terminology is being created? | What lexical creation systems predominate? There is a common denominator in all languages: terms are generated in English and come in as loanwords. How do the receiving languages respond to this? How do they deal with Internet terminology? Are all those words which seem to be terms actually terms? Do they meet actual needs for names or do sensationalist, ephemeral terms abound?
| list | N-N | TERM38_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Zelako terminologia sortzen ari da? | Zeintzuk dira lexikoaren sorkuntzan gailentzen ari diren sistemak?
| Ezaugarri berdin eta komun bat daukate hizkuntza guztiek: terminoak ingelesez sortzen dira, eta mailegu moduan sartzen dira beste hizkuntzetan.
| Nola erantzuten dute hizkuntza hartzaileek?
| Nola lantzen dute Interneteko terminologia?
| Termino al dira termino itxurako guztiak?
| Izendatzeko benetako premiei erantzuten al diete? Edo, aldiz, lexikoaren sorkuntzan asko eta asko ez ote dira sentsazionalismoan erori eta azkar galduko direnak?
| list | N-N | TERM38_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
a) the scarcity of prefixes in Basque as compared to the abundance of suffixes; | and b) the fact that this imbalance is not shared by the romance languages.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Firstly, derivation processes based on prefixes and suffixes have been analysed in all three languages, with special emphasis on those cases in which the basis for derivation is a verb and those in which the derivative is a verb. Two substantial differences have been found: one is between prefixes and suffixes within Basque and the other is between Basque derivatives and those of romance origin. | Secondly, a theoretical exposition of these two differences has been sought and found.
| Thirdly, we have attempted to consolidate the contribution of this theoretical exposition to the field of lexicography.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
In the former case the prefix provides specificity for the core (the derivative predecir is a more specific version of the core decir, but to say before is, after all, still to say). | In the latter case, the core is made up of the prefix itself, and the core is the basis of the derivation, so that prehistoria is not a more specific version of the basic complement historia but something different altogether.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
First of all, it has the prefix des-, which has both possibilities, as in the case of the romance languages. In the derivative desegin it acts as a modifier of the basic core egin (the antonym of do), but when we seek an example of the prefix/core complement type (deshojar), desostatu, we find that it is not properly formed. Observe that the prefixes ber-/bir ''re' and ez- 'in-/des-'also act in the same way.
As regards lexicographic conclusions, the first point which must be stressed in this paper is the difficulty found in forming words such as desostatu. | Secondly, we must make it clear that the prefix-core/base-complement of the romance languages and English has a corresponding feature in Basque in base-complement/suffix-core. This is an important contribution to modern lexicography. Beyond formations of the des1 hoja2 r ??hosto2 gabe1 tu type we must bear in mind the option hostoak2 galdu/kendu1 but especially the forms pozoin-du (en-venenar), bigun-du (re-blancederse), lerro-ka-tu (a-linear), irin-ez-ta-tu (enharinar), lur-rera-tu (a-terrizar), which should be standardised as the common correspondents of the prefixes a-, des-, en-, es-, in- and re- so that more and better resources are made available.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Lehenik, atzizki eta aurrizkien bidezko eratorpen-prozesuak aztertu dira hiru hizkuntzetan, bereziki eratorpen-oinarri modura aditza dutenak edo eratorri modura aditza ematen dutenak arakatuz; ondorioz, bi desberdintasun nagusi aurkitu dira: euskararen barruan atzizki eta aurrizkien bidezko eratorpenen arteko, eta euskal eratorrien eta eratorri erromanikoen artekoa. | Bigarrenik, bi desberdintasun horietarako azalpen teoriko bat bilatu eta aurkitu da.
| Hirugarrenik, azalpen teoriko horrek lexikogintzan eman dezakeen laguntza finkatzen saiatu gara.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Ondorio lexikografikoei begira, lehenik desostatu bezalakoak egiteko eragozpenak azpimarratuko genituzke hitzaldi honetan. | Bigarrenik, agerian utziko genuke hizkuntza erromanikoen (eta ingelesen) aurrizki-burua/oinarri-osagarriaren euskal ordaina oinarriosagarria/ atzizki-burua dela zuzen-zuzenean. Honek laguntza paregabea emango du gaurko lexikogintzan: des1 hoja2 r ?hosto2 gabe1 tu bezalako saioetatik haruntzago, kontutan hartu beharko dugu hostoak2 galdu/kendu1 bezalako aukera, baina bereziki, pozoin-du 'envenenar', bigun-du 're-blandecerse', lerro-ka-tu 'a-linear', irin-ez-ta-tu 'en-harinar', lur-reratu 'a-terrizar' direlako "jauziak" estandartzat hartu beharko dira, a-, des-, en-, es-, in- edo re bezalako aurrizkien ordainak aurkitzerakoan bide emankorrak eriden nahi baditugu.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
a) euskarak atzizki ugari baditu ere, oso aurrizki gutxi dauka, | eta b) desoreka hori ez dago inola ere hizkuntza erromanikoetan.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Lehenengo kasuan, aurrizkiak buruaren zehaztasun bat adierazten du (predecir eratorria, decir oinarriburuaren zehaztasun bat da: aurretik esan, baina esan, azken finean); | bigarren kasuan, aurrizkia bera da burua, osagarria eratorpen-oinarria delarik; izan ere, Prehistoria ez da historia oinarri-osagarriaren zehaztasun bat, oinarria (historia) ez den bestelako gauza bat baizik).
| list | N-N | TERM50_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Lehenik, erromantikoetan aurreko era bietara jokatzen duen des- atzizki mailegatuak, desegin eratorrian, egin oinarri-buruaren modifikatzaile modura jokatzen du aurrean kokatuz (egitearen alderantzizkoa), baina aurrizki-osagarria/oinarriburua eredua aurkitu nahi dugunean (deshojar), desostatu gaizki eginda dagoela beha daiteke nonbait; | ber-/bir- 're-' eta ez- 'in-/des-' aurrizkiek ere, horrelaxe jokatzen dute.
| list | N-N | TERM50_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
1. Analysis of the problem from the viewpoint of users of geographical terms. | 2. Importance of and need for a standardisation of geographical terms as part of work to standardise toponyms.
| Reference will be made to the recommendations of the UN and of various specialists.
| 3. Summary of how geographical terms have been dealt with in toponymic standardisation work by the DEIKER institute at the University of Deusto.
| 4. Conclusions. Questions and answers
| list | N-N | TERM51_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
1. We do not know the exact meaning of many generic elements: "alto" (given here in Basque as "gaina") could mean "mountain pass", "hill", "peak" or various other things. | 2. "Standardised" geographical terms may be allocated arbitrarily. For instance in the district of Deusto we find avenida ("avenue") used for two thoroughfares which should not both be described thus: "Avenida Ram贸n y Cajal" is an ordinary street, while "Avenida Lehendakari Agirre" is a true avenue.
| 3. There is a lack of standardised geographical terminology. For instance the Spanish term avenida is translated into Basque variously as ibilbidea, etorbidea or pasealekua, depending on which Town Hall allocated the names. Likewise the Spanish term pico ("peak") may appear as gallur, haitzorrotza, haizpunta, mokorra, mokoa, punta, or tontorra depending on the author or research body involved (DEIKER, Elhuyar, Government of Navarra, Euskatzaindia, etc.).
| list | N-N | TERM51_A1.rs3 | A1 | TERM | |
Entitate geografikoaren izaera orokorrean hartuta identifikatzen du azken osagai horrek, | eta osagai espezifikoak, aldiz, modu partikularrean identifikatzen du".
| list | N-N | TERM51_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
Horrek esan nahi du, hala, oso goitik hartuta, osagai orokorra itzuli egin daitekeela, | eta osagai espezifikoa bat ere aldatu gabe utzi behar dela.
| list | N-N | TERM51_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |
1.- Ez dugu ezagutzen osagai orokor askoren esanahi zehatza: "alto", "gaina" (bortua, mendia, gailurra...). | 2.- "Normalizatutako" termino geografikoa edonola esleitzen da: adibidez, Deustuko auzoan bi "etorbide" aurkitzen dira, eta egia esan, ez lukete termino bera eduki behar: Avenida Ram贸n y Cajal (kalea) eta Avenida Lehendakari Agirre (etorbidea).
| 3.- Ez dago geografiako terminologia normalizaturik: adibidez, "avenida" terminoa itzultzeko "ibilbidea", "etorbidea", "pasealekua" etab. erabiltzen dira, udal bakoitzaren arabera, edo "pico" itzultzeko, "gailur", "haitzorrotza", "haizpunta", "mokorra", "mokoa", "punta", "tontorra"... ikerketa egin duen pertsonaren edo erakundearen arabera (DEIKER, Elhuyar, Nafarroako Gobernua, Euskaltzaindia...).
| list | N-S | TERM51_A3.rs3 | A3 | TERM | |